Thursday, December 25, 2014

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

School sucks

The Truth About Voting

By James Corbett
September 12, 2012
The sheer absurdity of the spectacle of the modern electoral process is nowhere more apparent than in the American presidential race.
Just like the Olympic games, every four years the presidential election comes around to distract and entertain the masses, and, just like the Olympic games, the proceedings are accompanied by much pomp, ceremony and pageantry and almost nothing at all of substance. The three-ring circus that is the race for the White House plays itself out with a tawdry predictability: the primaries energize the party base and introduce the key themes for the election cycle. Immediately, these are reduced in media coverage of the debates to memes, vague concepts and one-word appeals to the lowest common intellectual denominator: economy, jobs, defense, welfare. By the time the left-right farce of the two-way debates gets underway, any pretence that there are actual issues at stake have been brushed aside. It is no longer about politics, but vacuous slogans: “Hope and Change” vs. “Country First.” “Forward” vs. “Believe in America.” It might as well be red vs. blue, Coke vs. Pepsi, or fork vs. spoon.
Remarkably, no one even notices the sleight of hand by which the political class and the media manage to transform the contest for the Oval Office into a meaningless contest of party slogans and political platitudes.
Romney is the opposite of everything conservatives profess to hold dear: When governor of Massachusetts, he argued for the individual health care mandate he later pretended to oppose. In 2004, Governor Romney signed one of the toughest gun control laws in the country. In 2005 he advocated a cap-and-tax to combat anthropogenic global warming.
Obama, too, is the precise opposite of his supporters’ ideal: He supported the bailout of the “too big to fails” in the 2008 financial crisis. He campaigned on getting lobbyists out of Washington, and then appointed lobbyist after lobbyist to his administration. He expanded Bush’s war on terror into Pakistan and Yemen and Somalia, mainlined the use of drone strikes and enshrined in Libya the doctine that the President no longer even needs Congress’ rubber stamp to start a war.
In his time in office he has started a presidential kill list that includes American citizens, and signed the NDAA, allowing the US military to arrest anyone, including Americans, anywhere, including on American soil, for any reason, and to detain them indefinitely without recourse to so much as a trial.
None of this matters to the vast majority of voters. They will lap it all up, mindless spectacle and all, following every move in the horse race, cheering when their erstwhile leader says something that sounds acceptable and jeering when the other team’s captain takes to the field. And when questioned on their own party’s platform, hardly one in ten will be able to accurately articulate it.
For those who can see past the facade to the empty, vacuous charade that is at the heart of this process, there are the easy explanations and trite solutions. It is a lack of education, they will argue. We need to invest more in civics education in the school system. It is a failure of the media, they will say. We need to strengthen media regulation to ensure fair and accurate reporting. It is a breakdown of the system itself, they will opine. We need electoral reform laws to fix the problem.
All of these so-called solutions rest on the same flawed premises: that the democratic process is fundamentally sound, but our implementation of that process is faulty. Quite the contrary. The system is not broken. It is functioning exactly as it was designed to.
This is a bitter pill for many to swallow. Surely there must be a political leader who conforms to our view of the way society should be run, at least most of the time, on most of the issues. All we have to do is convince enough people to vote for this saviour and our societal redemption will be assured. In this worldview, salvation always comes from on high in Washington, D.C., and the entirety of the population keeps waiting for that political messiah who never arrives, making do with the closest approximation they can find between the candidates that Team Republicrat and Team Democan field each election cycle.
But why is it that we—all of us in our so-called developed Western democracies—put all of our political energies—to the extent we care at all anymore about these rigged political contests—into these elections that the vast majority of the voting public believe at best to be a necessary civic duty? Why do voters hold their collective noses once every four years and to pull the lever (or, better yet, touch the screen) for the lesser of two evils in order to “keep the other guy out?”
Does anyone really believe that this process will ever achieve anything other than what it already has over the preceding centuries? Does anyone believe that our modern electoral system is the best, sanest, noblest or most ethical way of finding accord with those around us? Does anyone believe that the corruption, waste, fraud, abuse and rampant criminality of our political class is anything other than the inevitable end result of this centuries-old democratic experiment?
These are not rhetorical questions. They are real questions, with a real answer. And that answer is”no.”
The reason that so few are willing to answer so plainly is because they are afraid of the implication of that answer: that politics itself is not the answer. Because if the answer is not to be found in voting in meaningless political pageants once every four years, then that begs the question: how is society to be organized?
This is where we discover the heart of the fraud. The question itself implies that we need some centralized authority to make the judgements for our society. It implies, at base, that we are but children, and that without mommy or daddy government to come in and organize our society, nothing would function. It implies that the answer is the precise opposite of what we have been told we need; not government, but freedom.
There will be those whose ideological blinders are so securely in place that a society without government will seem as unlivable to them as an atmosphere without oxygen. Having existed in the spacesuit bubble of statism their entire lives, they will be so deathly afraid of removing themselves from that cocoon that they will mock the mere suggestion that we take off our helmets and breathe the open air of a stateless society. “Surely you jest,” they will say. “How can we live without government?”
These are the same people who will ask how our children will be educated in the absence of a government-run school system without bothering to ask how children were educated for the milennia of human history before government-run education.
These are the same people who will ask how we will care for the sick and the unemployed without asking how charity and basic human decency functioned before it became a government-imposed monopoly.
These are the same people who will ask how we will keep unscrupulous businessmen in line without government regulators without bothering to notice that not a single banker has gone to jail for the worst economic crimes in the history of humanity under the most extensive governemntal regulatory regimes in the history of humanity.
These are the same people who will happily vote for whichever candidate promises to supply the most benefits for the country without admitting that every single benefit that the government can bestow has been either stolen from the wallet of the taxpayer or, worse yet, created through debt-based money printing that puts the noose of mathematically unextinguishable debt around the necks of children yet unborn.
These are the same people who will teach their children that it is always wrong for us to initiate the use of force on others and to take things against their will, but will see no contradiction in supporting a system called “government” that is made up of individuals whom they grant the authority to do precisely that.
In short, these are the people who will neither be honest with themselves nor look objectively at the system around them. They have not entered the plane of moral argument, and will forever be wedded to a system they have never even bothered to understand. They will cast their votes happily in the next election, patting themselves on the back for having done their civic duty, and will go back to their lives,
wondering why our society is falling apart and what the next political candidate will promise to do about it.
For the rest of us, there is the realization that the political system itself is just another form of enslavement. An enslavement that is all the more insidious, because it asks us to buy into it. All we have to do is push a button or pull a lever or touch a screen once every four years and we are now absolved of our moral responsibility.
Ironically, this realization is in itself liberating and puts the world into focus with crystal clarity. We are not cogs in some machine called “society” to be dictated to by some nebulous entity we have been taught to call “the government” or “the authorities.” We are free individuals freely interacting with those around us, bound by the moral injunction not to initiate force against others or take things from others against their will. We are responsible for our actions and their consequences, both positive and negative. We are responsible for what we do or don’t do to help those in our community, and to make this world better or leave it to rot. There is no political messiah that will descend from the heavens to tell us what to do or to protect us from the bad men. All we have is our self and our choices.
We vote every day, not in some meaningless election, but in who we choose to associate with, what we choose to spend our money on, what we choose to invest our time and energy doing. This is the essence of freedom.
For us, it is painful to watch our brothers and sisters getting swept up in the election cycle hype. We watch the sad spectacle not with a sense of scorn or derision, but with sadness for those who have not yet woken up to the reality of their mental enslavement. That sadness, however, is tempered by hope: hope that one day, those poor voters who are trudging off to that booth to pull that lever will realize that all they are really doing is voting for which slavemaster they will allow to put the chains around their neck.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Liberty Classroom

Learn real history and economics in your car. Ask questions of the experts. Train yourself to be a defender of liberty.
For less than one movie ticket a month, get absolutely everything we have.

Liberty Classroom's ambitious goal is to equip as many ambassadors of liberty as possible with the knowledge they need to win that battle. We take a machete to the comic-book version of U.S. and European history most of us learned in school. We don't believe the version of events that credits government with all the good things of civilization, that insists we'd be lost without the political class, and that warns us of the wickedness and exploitation to be found in the voluntary sector of society.

We're starting with history, but watch for other subjects to come. Win more debates. Spread the message more effectively.
Understand the world better. Learn from — and interact with — some of the most respected and accomplished scholars in the liberty movement.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Why Public Schools Need To Go!

·         They promote an evasion of parental responsibility
o   People remain children until they become parents. When two people have a child they are no longer individuals, they become a family. The new parents now have the highest level of responsibility that they will ever have. Raising a child goes way beyond simple subsistence; they must create an environment of compassion and love. Young children learn best by example because they are curious and want to participate in everything they see. Parents must be loving and kind without coercion or violence (that includes spanking!) in order for the child to learn how to live peacefully and be happy.
o   When parents are forced to hand over their children to public schools then they lose the ability to provide a healthy environment for their child. Government employees, policies, and peers are now the largest influences on that child’s life. Eight hours a day, 180 days a year for 13+ years in the hands of government is devastating to a child. Children are raised by their peers and the parents lose control of their most important duty in life, parenthood; this is the root of our social collapse and disconnection.

·         Public schools are morally hypocritical
o   If a child in a public school were to punch another child in the face and snatch his lunch money then the teacher would consider that wrong and proceed to punish the child. However, this is exactly how the teacher is paid! Taxes are forcibly extracted from people with the threat of violence in order to pay for the public school system. A parent cannot teach a child that violence and coercion is wrong, and then support violence and coercion in their everyday lives. Violence is the foundation of the public school system. It does not matter if a person is 5 years old or 50, violence and coercion is wrong!

·         Public schools restrict freedom
o   School is a prison!
o   This is not a voluntary situation, children are forced to attend school and parents are threatened with violence if their children do not attend school. Most children would admit that they would rather do something else besides go to school; but they have no choice. Their freedom is restricted for 8 hours a day (plus time for homework), 180 days a year for 13+ years; such a large portion of their lives devoted to following orders.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Disturbing Trend In Colleges

    Since the restart of my college experience in 2007, a disturbing trend seemed to emerge that I never experienced before… the complete disappearance of entrepreneurial opportunities in the academic conversation. The focus is now on jobs and employment; self-employment is now like the 13th floor in a hotel. I know this is may seem hairsplitting, but I really think it is an injustice to students (and society) since at least one in every 10 people have an entrepreneurial drive and no jobs would exist without them.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

A response to the question: "what the election of Barack Obama, the first African American President, means to me"

I am so disconnected (disgusted?) from politics that I completely don't care who the president is. It doesn't really matter to me. From Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton to Bush 2 it did not make a big difference to me. Just like it doesn't make a diff who won the super bowl, it may to some people (just because they are voluntarily consumed in sports). But I am not consumed by politics or sports for that matter. At least within my sociometry, I don't see any major changes due to the "winner" of the presidency.
As far a race is concerned, only a racist would rejoice over that! But that's politics: racist, hypocrites, deceivers and narcissists. The people in this country should save the rejoicing until after the job is done. Just a few years ago people were giving Bush #2 standing ovations, now they are disgusted by him. The politician code: good=glory; bad=blame.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Thoughts on Electricity

Ultimately, the best way for power generation would be localized, clean and renewable energy sources that can meet the needs of the people. Personal power generation will be the best, safest and most reliable way to generate electricity. Transmitting electricity great distances is very inefficient, transmission losses can average up to 10%.

We already have a natural nuclear power plant… it's called the Sun. The Sun bathes the earth with energy all day every day. Plants and animals have no problem harnessing its power to meet their needs, I am sure we can too.

Personal solar panels are becoming more affordable and many people are now completely self sufficient without sacrificing their demand for electricity. The combination of efficient use and local generation of electricity may be the ultimate solution.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

The New Ideology…

War = peace

Freedom = slavery

Ignorance = strength

Thursday, March 17, 2011

I think that marriage, like any relationship should be detached yet supportive.

Consider the analogy of a bridge with two pillars that have the ability to stand strong independently, but where they meet in the middle there is absolutely no pressure on each other, yet a tremendous amount of support is gained from the union.

see picture and think about it…

Tuesday, January 4, 2011


Our lifetimes are fleeting, like magnificent ocean waves toward the shoreline. Some waves are well defined like a powerful force, others barely swell. Some waves crash harder than others, some lift others, and some waves suppress others. Nevertheless, all waves reach the shoreline only to be consumed back into the ocean. Life is like ocean waves, fleeting yet part of a whole.

Time to Think

Time is the most valuable resource we have; thinking is a valuable activity and is worth your time. Take time to think (meditate) several times a day because decisions demand thought to be made correctly. Making the wrong decisions wastes your time more than anything else.


Greatness is measured by a comparison of our limitations and accomplishments.


Freedom as it applies to the United States in current times is like a fairly large and somewhat camouflaged gage; The cage is a matrix of laws, in which the ignorant and/or indifferent population has allowed to be ever more restrictive.

American People

America … we went from over-achieving to coasting on past-achievements; floating on credit.